MCPSERV.CLUB
MarcusJellinghaus

MCP Code Checker

MCP Server

AI-Driven Code Quality Checks for Your Projects

Active(73)
11stars
2views
Updated 11 days ago

About

The MCP Code Checker server integrates pylint, pytest, and mypy to analyze your codebase within a specified project directory. It generates smart prompts for AI assistants, enabling natural language-driven debugging and automated fix suggestions.

Capabilities

Resources
Access data sources
Tools
Execute functions
Prompts
Pre-built templates
Sampling
AI model interactions

MCP Code Checker – Python

The MCP Code Checker server is a lightweight, protocol‑first service that lets AI assistants perform comprehensive code quality analyses directly inside a project’s directory. By exposing dedicated tools for linting, testing, and type checking as MCP resources, the server enables assistants such as Claude or GitHub Copilot to run these checks on demand and return structured results that can be turned into actionable prompts. This bridges the gap between human intent expressed in natural language and automated tooling, allowing developers to ask questions like “What are the style issues in my code?” or “Why is this test failing?” and receive precise, context‑aware answers.

What Problem Does It Solve?

Modern Python projects often rely on a suite of static analysis and testing tools—pylint for style, pytest for unit tests, mypy for type safety. Managing these tools manually can be tedious: developers must remember the correct command line flags, handle virtual environments, and interpret noisy output. The MCP Code Checker abstracts this complexity behind a single, well‑defined interface. It guarantees that all operations are scoped to the specified project directory, preventing accidental runs on unrelated files and ensuring consistent environments. As a result, developers can focus on writing code while the assistant handles diagnostics and remediation suggestions.

Core Capabilities

  • Linting with pylint – Executes a configurable pylint run, filtering by message categories or disabling specific error codes. The server returns the raw report and a smart prompt that an LLM can use to explain each issue.
  • Testing with pytest – Runs tests with optional markers, verbosity levels, and custom arguments. Environment variables can be supplied to mimic production settings.
  • Type Checking with mypy – Supports strict mode, selective error suppression, and import handling options. The output is packaged into a concise summary for the assistant.
  • Combined Checks – A single call to orchestrates pylint, pytest, and mypy sequentially, aggregating results into a unified report that highlights overlapping issues.

All operations are performed via subprocesses launched within the project’s context, ensuring reproducibility and isolation. The server also exposes a CLI for manual use, but its primary value shines when integrated into AI workflows.

Real‑World Use Cases

  • Continuous Feedback in IDEs – An assistant embedded in VSCode can trigger a full quality audit whenever the user saves a file, then surface explanations and auto‑suggested fixes inline.
  • Automated Code Review – During pull request reviews, a bot can invoke the server to generate a report that the reviewer can consult, reducing manual linting steps.
  • Educational Environments – Students learning Python can ask the assistant to explain why a test fails or why a lint warning appears, receiving instant, tailored explanations.
  • CI/CD Pipelines – The server can be called from a CI job to produce structured diagnostics that feed into dashboards or failure notifications.

Integration with AI Workflows

Because the server follows MCP, any client that implements the protocol can consume its resources. The assistant’s prompt generation functions (, etc.) turn raw tool output into natural‑language explanations, making the results immediately usable by an LLM. Developers can then instruct the assistant to modify code files based on these prompts, effectively turning a diagnostic cycle into an interactive repair loop. The server’s configuration parameters allow fine‑tuning of the analysis to match project conventions, ensuring that AI suggestions are relevant and actionable.

Unique Advantages

  • Protocol‑First Design – Full compatibility with any MCP client without vendor lock‑in.
  • Scoped Execution – All checks run inside the user’s project directory, eliminating accidental cross‑project analysis.
  • Unified Reporting – Aggregated results from multiple tools provide a holistic view of code health, reducing cognitive load.
  • Extensibility – New checks can be added as additional resources while preserving the same interface, keeping the server future‑proof.

In summary, the MCP Code Checker empowers AI assistants to become proactive code reviewers and helpers. By consolidating linting, testing, and type checking into a single, well‑defined service, it streamlines the development workflow, accelerates issue resolution, and makes advanced tooling accessible through natural language interactions.